Re: [PATCH] [5/18] Expand the hugetlbfs sysctls to handle arrays for all hstates

[Mel Gorman]

On (18/03/08 17:49), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:
> > Also, offhand it's not super-clear why max_huge_pages is not part of
> > hstate as we only expect one hstate per pagesize anyway.
> 
> They need to be an separate array for the sysctl parsing function.
> 

D'oh, of course. Pointing that out answers my other questions in relation to
how writing single values to a proc entry affects multiple pools as well. I
was still thinking of max_huge_pages as as a single value instead of an array.

Thanks

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/