Re: Hyperthreading performance oddities

[Andi Kleen]

Chris Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Turning on hyperthreading effectively halves the amount of cache
> available for each logical CPU when both are doing work, which can do
> more harm than good.

When the two cores are in the same address space (as in being two
threads of the same process) L1 cache will be shared on P4. I think
for the other cases the cache management is also a little more
sophisticated than a simple split, depending on which HT generation
you're talking about (Intel had at least 4 generations out, each with
improvements over the earlier ones)

BTW your argument would be in theory true also for multi core with
shared L2 or L3, but even there the CPUs tend to be more sophisticated.
e.g. Core2 has a mechanism called "adaptive cache" which allows one
Core to use significantly more of the L2 in some cases.

>  Number-crunching applications that utilize the
> cache effectively generally don't benefit from hyperthreading,
> particularly floating-point-intensive ones.

That sounds like a far too broad over generalization to me.

-Andi (who personally always liked HT)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/