Re: [PATCH] Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net (v2)

From: Stephen Smalley
Date: Fri Mar 07 2008 - 08:28:41 EST



On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 15:03 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >>> Does this break SELinux labeling of /proc/net inodes and thus its access
> >>> controls on them?
> >> It should not, since the proc_dir_etries are still organized in
> >> a required hierarchy.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it does break selinux labeling of /proc/net inodes.
> > Easily seen by running ls -ZR /proc/net before and after the patch is
> > applied and comparing the results.
> >
> > Also, as a separate issue, a "find /proc/self/net ..." will show that
> > the hard link count is wrong for it.
>
> Oops... I've checked this thing explicitly before sending, but it looks
> like I used too old find version. I.e. 4.1.20 worked OK, but 4.2.23
> reported the nlink discrepancy.
>
> Anyway, this is fixed now (see below). I override the getattr method for
> /proc/net directory and update one from the net->proc_net entry, which
> is calculated correctly.
>
> > Currently the inodes get labeled by selinux_proc_get_sid() by walking up
> > the proc_dir_entry tree to generate a name and prefix matching that name
> > in policy. Before the patch, we'd get names like "//net/tcp", i.e.
> > relative to the root of proc (the extra leading slash is due to the
> > earlier proc net rewrite which also broke selinux until we adjusted it
> > to ignore it). After the patch, we just get "//tcp", which is ambiguous
> > since we would also get that for a /proc/tcp inode if one existed.
>
> OK, got it. Is it good if we used to get the //net/tcp, but will /net/tcp
> (without the double slash)? The patch below does exactly this. It initializes
> the name for the net->proc_net entry and makes its parent be proc_root.
>
> Can you Ack this patch, so that I can merge it with the original one and
> re-post the combined v3?

Thanks, ls -ZR /proc/net now yields the same output before and after the
patch.

Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> > Not trying to obstruct your proc net improvements, but just want to make
> > sure that selinux doesn't get broken in the process.
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_net.c b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
> index 18d413c..4caa5f7 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
> @@ -96,8 +96,27 @@ static struct dentry *proc_tgid_net_lookup(struct inode *dir,
> return de;
> }
>
> +static int proc_tgid_net_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> + struct kstat *stat)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> + struct net *net;
> +
> + net = get_proc_task_net(inode);
> +
> + generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
> +
> + if (net != NULL) {
> + stat->nlink = net->proc_net->nlink;
> + put_net(net);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> const struct inode_operations proc_net_inode_operations = {
> .lookup = proc_tgid_net_lookup,
> + .getattr = proc_tgid_net_getattr,
> };
>
> static int proc_tgid_net_readdir(struct file *filp, void *dirent,
> @@ -162,6 +181,10 @@ static __net_init int proc_net_ns_init(struct net *net)
> goto out;
>
> netd->data = net;
> + netd->nlink = 2;
> + netd->name = "net";
> + netd->namelen = 3;
> + netd->parent = &proc_root;
>
> err = -EEXIST;
> net_statd = proc_net_mkdir(net, "stat", netd);
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/