Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE_ALIGN alignment

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thu Mar 06 2008 - 22:23:10 EST


On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 07:18:54PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > No, it *is not about avoiding cacheline contention*. As such, the rest
> > of what you wrote below about smp_align etc is rubbish.
> >
> > Can you actually read what I posted?
>
> I am trying but it barely makes sense. You first state that it
> is *not* about avoiding cacheline contention and then argue that it
> reduces cacheline contention.

Where do I argue that it reduces cacheline contention? All arguments
I made apply to a UP system equally.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/