Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

[Paolo Bonzini]

Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:58:41AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > If the kernel allows state to leak from one process to another,
> > for example from a process running as root to a process running as an
> > ordinary user, it's a bug, with possible security implications.
>
> I don't think that it is relevant in your case.  If you have the
> signal handler in something that does not share the VM with the
> interrupted thread, you will have a context switch which is supposed
> to store the direction flag and restore the one from the handling
> thread.  If you share the VM there is no context switch but you have
> access to the exact same memory with the exact same rights, making the
> leak irrelevant.

A process can send a signal via kill.  IOW, a malicious process can 
*control when the process would be interrupted* in order to get it into 
the signal handler with DF=1.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/