[PATCH -mm 1/2] send_sigqueue: don't take rcu lock

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Wed Mar 05 2008 - 16:54:26 EST


(depends on lock_task_sighand-add-rcu-lock-unlock.patch)

lock_task_sighand() was changed, send_sigqueue() doesn't need rcu_read_lock()
any longer.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- 25/kernel/signal.c~1_SS_NO_RCU 2008-03-06 00:31:08.000000000 +0300
+++ 25/kernel/signal.c 2008-03-06 00:35:35.000000000 +0300
@@ -1311,8 +1311,6 @@ int send_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigque
* We return -1, when the task is marked exiting, so
* posix_timer_event can redirect it to the group leader
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
-
if (!likely(lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)))
goto out_err;

@@ -1323,8 +1321,6 @@ int send_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigque

unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
out_err:
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
return ret;
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/