Re: prctl(0x8) -> EINVAL [Was: 2.6.25-rc3-mm1]

[Jiri Slaby]

On 03/05/2008 03:06 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> From 4a66f19580489a3ac84f0a145e4585c09e65c88e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 06:02:32 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] capabilities: use cap_task_prctl when !CONFIG_SECURITY
>
> capabilities-implement-per-process-securebits.patch introduced
> cap_task_prctl() and moved the handling of capability-related
> prctl into it.  So when !CONFIG_SECURITY, the default
> security_task_prctl() needs to call cap_task_prctl() the way
> other default hooks call capability helpers when they exist.
>
> This fixes a slew of userspace breakages when
> CONFIG_SECURITY=n.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/