Re: preempt bug in set_pmd_pfn?
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Tue Mar 04 2008 - 16:33:42 EST
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think set_pmd_pfn, which is only called by __set_fixmap, might have
a preempt bug in it.
yes, and we had similar preemption bugs in the past. I guess most places
are either infrequent or have some natural atomicity anyway. Wanna send
a patch?
Sure. Should it just disable preemption, or take a lock? It calls
set_pte_at without holding any pte locks; that seems to be relatively
common. Is it OK when you're operating on init_mm?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/