Re: locking api self-test hanging

[Marcin Slusarz]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:05:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:16:43 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:34:12 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:43:04 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:07:44 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:02:46 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > With current mainline I'm getting intermittent hangs here:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/p2033590.jpg
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > with this config:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-sony.txt
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > on the Vaio.  Sometimes it boots (then hits another different hang),
> > > > > > sometimes it gets stuck there.
> > > > 
> > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS=n fixed that up.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The second hang is in kobject_uevent_init().  All that function does is call
> > > > > netlink_kernel_create().
> > > > 
> > > > And I've fully bisected this hang twice and both times came up with
> > > > 
> > > > commit 33f807ba0d9259e7c75c7a2ce8bd2787e5b540c7
> > > > Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date:   Mon Nov 19 19:24:52 2007 -0800
> > > > 
> > > >     [NETPOLL]: Kill NETPOLL_RX_DROP, set but never tested.
> > > > 
> > > > which is stupid because that patch doesn't do anything.
> > > > 
> > > > However I am using netconsole-over-e100 and the hang does go away when I
> > > > disable netconsole on the kernel boot command line.
> > > > 
> > > > I'd say it's some timing thing in netpoll/netconsole/napi/etc.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I'm seeing this netconsole hang on a second machine now.  Current
> > > mainline.  It also has e100.  This one is SMP ancient PIII.
> > > 
> > > Config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-vmm.txt
> > > 
> > 
> > I can reproduce this on a third machine: the t61p laptop: dual x86_64 with
> > e1000.
> > 
> > It seems to need quite a lot of printk activity to make it happen.  Turning
> > on initcall_debug is a suitable way of triggering it.
> > 
I've seen it once too. But I thought it had something to do with this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/2/91

> This netconsole regression is still present in current mainline.  Rafael,
> can you please add it to the list?
> 
> It's strange that I can hit it on three separate machines with e100 and e1000
> yet nobody else has reported it (afaik).  Is nobody using netconsole?

ps: I don't have any e100* card
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/