Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE_ALIGN alignment

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi,

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > HWCACHE_ALIGN means that you want the object to be aligned at
> > > cacheline boundaries for optimization. Why does crossing cacheline
> > > boundaries matter in this case?
> >
> > No, HWCACHE_ALIGN means that you want the object not to cross cacheline
> > boundaries for at least cache_line_size() bytes. You invented new

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Interesting new definition....

Well, not my definition either but SLAB has guaranteed that for small
objects in the past, so I think Nick has a point here. However, with
all this back and forth, I've lost track why this matters. I suppose
it causes regression on some workload?

                                Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/