Re: [patch] x86, i387: fix ptrace leakage using init_fpu()

From: Roland McGrath
Date: Mon Mar 03 2008 - 16:12:49 EST

Next message: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [patch] Re: using long instead of atomic_t when only set/read is required"
Previous message: Jonathan Corbet: "Re: [PATCH] Add seq_file howto to Documentation/"
In reply to: Suresh Siddha: "[patch] x86, i387: fix ptrace leakage using init_fpu()"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] x86, i387: fix ptrace leakage using init_fpu()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Looks like a good fix to me.

Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [patch] Re: using long instead of atomic_t when only set/read is required"
Previous message: Jonathan Corbet: "Re: [PATCH] Add seq_file howto to Documentation/"
In reply to: Suresh Siddha: "[patch] x86, i387: fix ptrace leakage using init_fpu()"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] x86, i387: fix ptrace leakage using init_fpu()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]