Re: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup."

[Li Zefan]

Xpl++ wrote:
> Paul Menage ??????:
> > ...
> >
> > A compromise might be to keep "tasks" unprefixed, and say that future
> > names get the "cgroup." prefix; in this case I'd be inclined to add
> > the prefix to notify_on_release and release_agent on the grounds that
> > there's much less chance of breaking anyone with those files since (I
> > suspect) they're much less used.
> >   
> This makes most sense to me. It won't break any existing software 
> (most likely) while it seems reasonable to leave 'tasks' unprefixed as 
> this is something that any software using any subsystem of cgroup 
> would be using anyway and it is not that much associated with a 
> particulat subsystem.

And it makes most sense to me too, though I still doubt name collision 
will be a problem.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/