Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers

[Al Viro]

On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:43:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>+#define S64_C(x) x ## LL
> >>+#define U64_C(x) x ## ULL
> >
> >but can't we use the latter for all arches?
> >
> 
> You really don't want to, as the whole point is that you want it to 
> match what u64/s64 is defined as, in order to avoid spurious warnings.

Excuse me, in which contexts?  Where does replacement of explicitly long
constant with explicitly long long one generate warnings on a host that has
range(long) equal to range(long long)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/