Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

From: minchan Kim
Date: Sun Mar 02 2008 - 22:07:44 EST


Sorry, I sended HTML format, so fail to send linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I will resend in TEXT/PLAIN format.

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM, minchan Kim <barrioskmc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One more thing.
>
> zoneinfo_show_print fail to show right information.
> That's why 'enum zone_stat_item' and 'vmstat_text' index didn't matched.
> This is a problem about CONFIG_NORECLAIM, too.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:58 +0900, minchan Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NORECLAIM
> > > +static inline void lru_cache_add_noreclaim(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > + __lru_cache_add(page, LRU_NORECLAIM);
> > > +}
> > > +#else
> > > +static inline void lru_cache_add_noreclaim(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > + BUG("Noreclaim not configured, but page added
> > > anyway?!");
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >
> > > BUG() can't take a argument.
> >
> > Right. I don't have a clue how that got there :-(.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lee
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> barrios



--
Thanks,
barrios
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/