Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread: add a missing memory barrier to kthread_stop()

[Rusty Russell]

On Thursday 21 February 2008 08:36:30 Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: kthread: add a missing memory barrier to kthread_stop()
>
> We must ensure that kthread_stop_info.k has been updated before
> kthread's wakeup. This is required to properly support
> the use of kthread_should_stop() in the main loop of kthread.
>
> wake_up_process() doesn't imply a full memory barrier,
> so we add an explicit one.

I always believed that wake_up_process() implies a write barrier.  It's pretty 
common to set something up then wake the intended recipient.

So I think this patch is overkill, but I'm happy to be corrected.

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/