Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation

[Ingo Molnar]

* Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C 
> implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and 
> extensibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

very nice work!

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/