Re: nf_conntrack fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible code

[Patrick McHardy]

Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 21.02.2008 12:28 schrieb Patrick McHardy:
> > > Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ntpdate/3562
> > > Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] caller is __nf_conntrack_find+0x9b/0xeb [nf_conntrack]
> > > Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] Pid: 3562, comm: ntpdate Not tainted 2.6.25-rc2-mm1-testing #1
> > > Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297]  [<c02015b9>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x99/0xb0
> > Could you test whether this patch fixes the netfilter
> > warnings please?
>
> Bad news: With 2.6.25-rc3, that bug has made it into mainline.
> Good news: Your patch fixes it there, too.

No, its been there since -rc1.

> So I suggest you forward it there as soon as possible.

Already done, should hit upstream soon.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/