Re: [PATCH] Add rdc321x defconfig file

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Wed Feb 27 2008 - 01:51:06 EST


On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:30:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>...
> what would be really useful is an automatic Kconfig tree analysis, with
> the printing out of too deep dependencies perhaps? Which might result in
> the breaking down of too deep dependencies - to increase the coverage of
> randconfig testing. Sometimes the number of "depends on" conditions are
> mind-blowing.

Sounds like the academic masturbation of trying to find an optimal
solution to a non-existing problem instead of fixing real issues.

The fact that most testers have a PC plus Toralfs randconfigs has
already catched virtually all compile issues visible on a PC in the
past during -rc.

If you want to attack real problems then write a script that sends the
names of all people who signed-off patches touching include/linux/ or
include/asm-generic/ without having tested the compilation of at least
the defconfig on all architectures to George W. Bush together with the
information that these people possess at least as many weapons of mass
destruction as Saddam Hussein in 2003...

> Ingo

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/