Re: Possible Serial Kernel Bug

From: Oliver Martin
Date: Thu Feb 21 2008 - 11:03:55 EST

Next message: Miller, Mike (OS Dev): "RE: [PATCH 1/1] resubmit: cciss: procfs updates to display infoabout many volumes"
Previous message: David Howells: "[PATCH] NOMMU: is_vmalloc_addr() won't compile if !MMU"
In reply to: Raynard Brown: "Possible Serial Kernel Bug"
Next in thread: Raynard Brown: "RE: Possible Serial Kernel Bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Raynard Brown schrieb:

0: uart:16550A port:000003F8 irq:4 tx:72 rx:6
1: uart:16550A port:000002F8 irq:3 tx:59 rx:6
2: uart:16550A port:000003E8 irq:11 tx:0 rx:0 RTS|DTR
3: uart:16550A port:000002E8 irq:10 tx:0 rx:0 RTS|DTR
4: uart:16550A port:000004F8 irq:0 tx:59 rx:6

^^^^^^^
Could it be that hardware flow control is enabled on the server, while it is disabled on the other side? What happens if you disable it with stty -F /dev/ttySX -rtscts?

Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Miller, Mike (OS Dev): "RE: [PATCH 1/1] resubmit: cciss: procfs updates to display infoabout many volumes"
Previous message: David Howells: "[PATCH] NOMMU: is_vmalloc_addr() won't compile if !MMU"
In reply to: Raynard Brown: "Possible Serial Kernel Bug"
Next in thread: Raynard Brown: "RE: Possible Serial Kernel Bug"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]