Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/8] Scaling msgmni to the amount of lowmem

[Nadia Derbey]

Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > +#define MAX_MSGQUEUES  16      /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
> > +
>
>
> It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
> maximum ;). A better name might better document what the test is
> actually trying to do.
>
> One question I have is whether the unpatched test is still valuable.
> Based on my limited knowledge of the test I suspect it's still a correct
> test of message queues. If so, perhaps renaming the old test (so it's
> not confused with a performance regression) and adding your patched
> version is best?

So, here's the new patch based on Matt's points.

Subrata, it has to be applied on top of the original ltp-full-20080131. 
Please tell me if you'd prefer one based on the merged version you've 
got (i.e. with my Tuesday patch applied).

Regards,
Nadia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/