Re: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memorycontroller in Kconfig

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:45:13 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > But for computers, limits is an expected and understood term, and for
> > filesystems it's quotas.  So in this case, I *still* think you should
> > be using the term "Memory Quota Controller" instead.  It just makes it
> > clearer to a larger audience what you mean.
> > 
> 
> Memory Quota sounds very confusing to me. Usually a quota implies limits, but in
> a true framework, one can also implement guarantees and shares.
> 
This "cgroup memory contoller" is called as "Memory Resource Contoller"
in my office ;)

How about Memory Resouce Contoller ?


-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/