Re: Purpose of numa_node?

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Wed Feb 20 2008 - 16:55:51 EST


On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:0f.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:10.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:11.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:12.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:12.0/0000:51:00.0/numa_node 1
> /sys/devices/pci0000:40/0000:40:13.0/numa_node 1
>
> The 5 last lines above would report 0 instead of 1 with an older kernel.
> Everything looks correct now (0000:40 is the second PCIe bus and it is
> attached to socket #1).
>
> Thanks a lot, Yinghai! Are you planning to merge these patches in the
> near future? 2.6.26?
>
ingo put them in x86.git#testing

please check
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README
to get that.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/