Re: [PATCH] atmel_spi: support zero length transfer

[Marc Pignat]

Hi!

On Wednesday 20 February 2008, you wrote:
> A spi transfer with zero length is not invalid.  Such transfer can be
> used to achieve delay before first CLK edge after chipselect assertion.
How long will be that delay?

If they are really users of that kind of thing, this should be fixed by adding
a "delay_us_before_xfer" field in the  struct spi_transfer.

Have you tested it? I think if you start a transfer with 0 len, the ENDRX bit
will never rise, however, I'm not sure about this.

Regards

Marc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/