[PATCH] do_task_stat: don't take rcu_read_lock()

[Oleg Nesterov]

(depends on "[PATCH 1/2] lock_task_sighand: add rcu lock/unlock",
 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120335433821564)

lock_task_sighand() was changed, and do_task_stat() doesn't need rcu_read_lock
any longer. sighand->siglock protects all "interesting" fields.

Except: it doesn't protect ->tty->pgrp, but neither does rcu_read_lock(), this
should be fixed.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- MM/fs/proc/array.c~DTS	2008-02-17 23:40:07.000000000 +0300
+++ MM/fs/proc/array.c	2008-02-20 19:53:37.000000000 +0300
@@ -425,7 +425,6 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file 
 	cutime = cstime = utime = stime = cputime_zero;
 	cgtime = gtime = cputime_zero;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
 		struct signal_struct *sig = task->signal;
 
@@ -469,7 +468,6 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file 
 
 		unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	if (!whole || num_threads < 2)
 		wchan = get_wchan(task);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/