Re: [PATCH] tlan: add static to function definitions

[Jeff Garzik]

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> The forward declarations were already marked static, make the definitions
> be static as well.  Fixes the sparse warnings as well.
>
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1403:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleInvalid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1435:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleTxEOF' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1521:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleStatOverflow' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1557:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleRxEOF' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1692:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleDummy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1722:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleTxEOC' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1770:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleStatusCheck' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1845:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_HandleRxEOC' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1905:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_Timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:1986:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_ResetLists' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2046:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_FreeLists' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2095:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PrintDio' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2130:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PrintList' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2166:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_ReadAndClearStats' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2242:1: warning: symbol 'TLan_ResetAdapter' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2328:1: warning: symbol 'TLan_FinishReset' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2451:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_SetMac' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2493:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyPrint' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2542:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyDetect' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2589:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyPowerDown' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2614:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyPowerUp' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2635:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyReset' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2663:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyStartLink' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2750:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_PhyFinishAutoNeg' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2906:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_MiiReadReg' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:2996:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_MiiSendData' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:3038:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_MiiSync' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:3077:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_MiiWriteReg' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:3147:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_EeSendStart' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:3187:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_EeSendByte' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:3248:6: warning: symbol 'TLan_EeReceiveByte' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/net/tlan.c:3306:5: warning: symbol 'TLan_EeReadByte' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Kept the style consistent with the rest of the file, checkpatch will complain.
>  drivers/net/tlan.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

applied


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/