Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (x64 thermal build failure)

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:29 -0800,
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a Ãcrit :

> ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said "don't
> bother". Apart from the obvious problem, this means that people will
> keep breaking CONFIG_DMI=n all the time, because they will forget the
> ifdefs, and the number of people who test with CONFIG_DMI=n will be
> small.

Yes, #ifdef CONFIG_DMI is not very comfortable. That why I proposed
things such as DECLARE_DMI_FIXUP_TABLE(), because it would force people
to use these macros, which would then be working correctly depending on
DMI=y/n. However, there's still the issue of driver_data that I
mentionned in my earlier post.

What should I do ? Option 1 ? Option 2 ? Give up with the patch ?

Thanks for your comments,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature