Re: [PATCH 1/5] signal(x86_32): Improve the signal stack overflowcheck

[Roland McGrath]

> Shouldn't such programs use sigsetjmp/siglongjmp, which should reset the 
> signal stack state?

That is not really related.  The distinction doesn't really exist for
programs using the normal API (setjmp is sigsetjmp(,1)).  What siglongjmp
guarantees handled is signal mask changes, not sigaltstack.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/