Re: Reducing debuginfo size by removing unneeded includes

[Andi Kleen]

> I found just it to be another reason for cleaning up the includes hell,
> but I agree completely that the correct solution is for gcc to do the
> right thing and eliminate unused debug types.

Yes, but I'm a little disappointed that it doesn't work either.
I remember long ago trying an original patch which did something
similar to -feliminate-dwarf2-* on a 3.3-hammer based gcc and
it actually shrunk the objdir size considerably.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/