Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups

[Ingo Molnar]

* Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The following was meant 100% seriously:
> 
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 16 May 2006
> - 1 May 2006
> - 23 Apr 2006

ouch ...

i guess this explains what static code metrics already suggest:

   $ code-quality fs/ext3/ fs/ext4/
                                errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
   fs/ext3/                        408           16055          25.4
   fs/ext4/                        394           25169          15.6

compared to:

   $ code-quality kernel/
                                errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
   kernel/                         739           98759           7.4

and i guess our hope is now in:

   $ code-quality fs/btrfs/
                                errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
   fs/btrfs/                       240           20556          11.6

(which hopefully will be a project done in a much more Linux-ish manner: 
open participation, the easy taking of patches, an inclusive, 
newbie-friendly contribution atmosphere, etc.)

	Ingo

ps. http://redhat.com/~mingo/x86.git/code-quality
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/