Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25

[Andi Kleen]

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> the initial plan was for a depreciation period. Sadly it was untenable since the API
> was changing entirely to fix bugs and add a really important feature
> (the ability to clflush the exact range rather than wbinvd'ing the caches of all cpus in the system), 

Just for the record: I posted full patches to implement clflush
support some time ago without changing any exported API. So your
claims that changing the API was needed to implement CLFLUSH are not
correct.

Also I believe some assumptions behind the new API are faulty (in
particular that the caller doesn't fully own the to be changed pages)
and make it actually impossible to implement the cache attribute PTE
changing operation fully correct according to the Intel x86 manual
(which requires temporary unmap)

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/