Re: [PATCH v2] Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (wakeup)

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:21:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> >For a 64 bit build we should error out if the compiler
> >fials to support -m32 (how unlikely that may be).
> >So I would prefer it unconditional for 64 bit.
> >
> 
> We will err out anyway.

But I assume in less obvious way.
It is a bit more intuitive to error out on missing
-m32 support than gcc failing to support .code16
or some other inline assembler magic.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/