[PATCH] fix workqueue plist init to include a spinlock

[Daniel Walker]

The lock field in plist_head_init() is used for debugging the plist,
and if a NULL is sent in it spews constant errors with debugging enabled ..
So I added what looks like the correct spinlocks into the plist_head_init().

Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/workqueue.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.24/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ linux-2.6.24/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu
 	INIT_WORK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
 	__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
 
-	plist_head_init(&barr->worklist, NULL);
+	plist_head_init(&barr->worklist, &cwq->lock);
 	plist_head_splice(&cwq->worklist, &barr->worklist);
 	barr->cwq = cwq;
 	init_completion(&barr->done);
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ init_cpu_workqueue(struct workqueue_stru
 
 	cwq->wq = wq;
 	spin_lock_init(&cwq->lock);
-	plist_head_init(&cwq->worklist, NULL);
+	plist_head_init(&cwq->worklist, &cwq->lock);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&cwq->more_work);
 	cwq->barrier = NULL;
 	init_waitqueue_head(&cwq->work_done);
-- 

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/