Re: [RFC] mmaped copy too slow?

[Paulo Marques]

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> at one point, I found the large file copy speed was different depending on
> the copy method.
>
> I compared below method
>  - read(2) and write(2).
>  - mmap(2) x2 and memcpy.
>  - mmap(2) and write(2).
>
> in addition, effect of fadvice(2) and madvice(2) is checked.
>
> to a strange thing, 
>    - most faster method is read + write + fadvice.
>    - worst method is mmap + memcpy.

One thing you could also try is to pass MAP_POPULATE to mmap so that the 
page tables are filled in at the time of the mmap, avoiding a lot of 
page faults later.

Just my 2 cents,

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

"All I ask is a chance to prove that money can't make me happy."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/