Re: [PATCH 2/2] updating ctime and mtime at syncing

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Tue Jan 15 2008 - 04:54:19 EST


> Thanks for your review, Peter and Miklos!
>
> I overlooked this case when AS_MCTIME flag has been turned off and the
> page is still dirty.
>
> On the other hand, the words "shall be marked for update" may be
> considered as just setting the AS_MCTIME flag, not updating the time
> stamps.
>
> What do you think about calling mapping_update_time() inside of "if
> (MS_SYNC & flags)"? I suggest such change because the code for
> analysis of the case you've mentioned above seems impossible to me.

I think that's a good idea. As a first iteration, just updating the
mtime/ctime in msync(MS_SYNC) and remove_vma() (called at munmap time)
would be a big improvement over what we currently have.

I would also recommend, that you drop mapping_update_time() and the
related functions from the patch, and just use file_update_time()
instead.

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/