Re: [patch 00/20] VM pageout scalability improvements

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Sun Dec 23 2007 - 20:14:02 EST


On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 04:29:36 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:

> > In the real world, users with large JVMs on their servers, which
> > sometimes go a little into swap, can trigger this system. All of
> > the CPUs end up scanning the active list, and all pages have the
> > referenced bit set. Even if the system eventually recovers, it
> > might as well have been dead.
> >
> > Going into swap a little should only take a little bit of time.
>
> Very fascinating, so we need to scale better with larger memory.
> I suspect part of the answer will lie with using large/huge pages.

Linus vetoed going to a larger soft page size, with good reason.

Just look at how much the 64kB page size on PPC64 sucks for most
workloads - it works for PPC64 because people buy PPC64 monster
systems for the kinds of monster workloads that work well with a
large page size, but it definately isn't general purpose.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/