Re: [Jan Beulich] [PATCH] constify tables inkernel/sysctl_check.c

From: Jan Beulich
Date: Fri Dec 21 2007 - 02:41:19 EST


Thanks for catching this!

>>> Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> 21.12.07 03:30 >>>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:14:05PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> Remains the question whether it is intended that many, perhaps even
> large, tables are compiled in without ever having a chance to get used,
> i.e. whether there shouldn't #ifdef CONFIG_xxx get added.

> -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_param_table[] = {
> +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {

we lost the _param, which will cause a duplicate definition with ..

> -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
> +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {

cut-n-paste thinko ?

Dave

--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/