Re: [PATCH] finish processor.h integration

[Frans Pop]

On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 6:54 PM, Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > > What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
> > > integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are
> > > moved to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are
> > > deleted. Note that there's much less headers included in the final
> > > version.
> >
> > Either I must be missing something or this patch was corrupted somehow.
>
> neither.
> Note the else in the middle. It's just a mistake in the comment.

Wouldn't an explicit second #ifdef block be a lot clearer (and improve 
maintainability) in this case?

An #else can easily be overlooked among other preprocessor commands or when 
#ifdefs get nested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/