Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: set s_blocksize from lower fs in sb

From: Michael Halcrow
Date: Fri Dec 14 2007 - 10:49:51 EST


On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:30:26AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> eCryptfs wasn't setting s_blocksize in it's superblock; just pick
> it up from the lower FS. Having an s_blocksize of 0 made things
> like "filefrag" which call FIGETBSZ unhappy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mike Halcrow <mhalcrow@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
> ---
>
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3.orig/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_read_super(struct su
> lower_mnt = nd.mnt;
> ecryptfs_set_superblock_lower(sb, lower_root->d_sb);
> sb->s_maxbytes = lower_root->d_sb->s_maxbytes;
> + sb->s_blocksize = lower_root->d_sb->s_blocksize;
> ecryptfs_set_dentry_lower(sb->s_root, lower_root);
> ecryptfs_set_dentry_lower_mnt(sb->s_root, lower_mnt);
> rc = ecryptfs_interpose(lower_root, sb->s_root, sb, 0);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/