Re: Print taint info in more places.

From: Dave Jones
Date: Thu Dec 13 2007 - 19:16:40 EST


On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:03:50AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > #define BUG() do { \
> > - printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__); \
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()! (%s)\n",
> > + __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, print_tainted()); \
> > panic("BUG!"); \
> > } while (0)
> > #endif
> >...
>
> Note that this only changes a handful of architectures and most likely
> not the ones you are interested in.

Good catch. I'm sure we had coverage on at least x86 before, so
it seems over the many rediffs this patch has had, some chunks got lost.
I'll resurrect that.

thanks,

Dave

--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/