Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Serialize HCA-relatedhCalls on POWER5

[Joachim Fenkes]

caitlin.bestler@xxxxxxxxx wrote on 13.12.2007 20:22:49:

> On Dec 13, 2007 12:30 AM, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The current implementation of the open iscsi initiator makes sure to
> > issue commands in thread (sleepable) context, see iscsi_xmitworker and
> > references to it in drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c , so this keeps ehca users
> > safe for the time being.

> I agree, *some* form of FMR support is important for iSER (and probably
> for NFS over RDMA as well). Rather than adding a crippled NO FMR
> mode it would make more sense to add support for FMR Work Requests.
> I'm not certain what, if any, impact that would have on the Power5 
problem,
> but that's certainly a cleaner path for iWARP.

Well, FMR WRs wouldn't change the eHCA issue -- the driver would have to 
make an hCall in any case, and the architecture says that the hCalls used 
in this scenario might return H_LONG_BUSY, causing the driver to sleep. No 
way around that. Because of this, eHCA's FMRs are actually standard MRs 
with a different API.

If, as Or said, the iSCSI initiator issues commands in sleepable context 
anyway, nothing would be lost by using standard MRs as a fallback solution 
if FMRs aren't available, would it?

J.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/