Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

[Michael Buesch]

On Thursday 13 December 2007 02:17:16 Ray Lee wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 4:48 PM, Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This driver is scheduled for removal, so I'd not touch it anymore
> > to avoid the possibility to introduce a lastminute regression.
> > The new drivers (b43 and b43legacy) have this fixed (in a different
> > way by completely removing it).
> 
> Uhm, hijacking the thread a bit here, but which driver is supposed to
> be supporting my 4309? Neither b43 nor b43legacy found my wireless,
> and I'm not seeing its PCI ID anywhere either of those...
> 
> $ lspci -s 02:02 -v;  lspci -n -s 02:02 -v -x
> 02:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4309 802.11a/b/g (rev 03)
>         Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 12f9
>         Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 64, IRQ 22
>         Memory at d0010000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
> 
> 02:02.0 0280: 14e4:4324 (rev 03)

The device is supported by b43.
The PCI ID is in the SSB PCI bridge code

static const struct pci_device_id b43_pci_bridge_tbl[] = {
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4301) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4307) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4311) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4312) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4318) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4319) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4320) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4321) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4324) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4325) },
        { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, 0x4328) },
        { 0, },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, b43_pci_bridge_tbl);

-- 
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/