Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memorycontroller

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:44:36 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> TODO:
> 
> 1. Should we have vm_events for the memory controller as well?
>    May be in the longer term
> 

ALLOC_STALL is recoreded as failcnt, I think.
I think DIRECT can be accoutned easily.

But I'm not in hurry very much, because all reclaimation is DIRECT, now.
After we implement background reclaim, we should consider it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/