[PATCH 05/42] Unionfs: documentation for any known issues

[Erez Zadok]

Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/issues.txt |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/issues.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/issues.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/issues.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9db1d70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/issues.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+KNOWN Unionfs 2.1 ISSUES:
+=========================
+
+1. Unionfs should not use lookup_one_len() on the underlying f/s as it
+   confuses NFSv4.  Currently, unionfs_lookup() passes lookup intents to the
+   lower file-system, this eliminates part of the problem.  The remaining
+   calls to lookup_one_len may need to be changed to pass an intent.  We are
+   currently introducing VFS changes to fs/namei.c's do_path_lookup() to
+   allow proper file lookup and opening in stackable file systems.
+
+2. Lockdep (a debugging feature) isn't aware of stacking, and so it
+   incorrectly complains about locking problems.  The problem boils down to
+   this: Lockdep considers all objects of a certain type to be in the same
+   class, for example, all inodes.  Lockdep doesn't like to see a lock held
+   on two inodes within the same task, and warns that it could lead to a
+   deadlock.  However, stackable file systems do precisely that: they lock
+   an upper object, and then a lower object, in a strict order to avoid
+   locking problems; in addition, Unionfs, as a fan-out file system, may
+   have to lock several lower inodes.  We are currently looking into Lockdep
+   to see how to make it aware of stackable file systems.  In the meantime,
+   if you get any warnings from Lockdep, you can safely ignore them (or feel
+   free to report them to the Unionfs maintainers, just to be sure).
+
+For more information, see <http://unionfs.filesystems.org/>.
-- 
1.5.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/