Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

[Tejun Heo]

Andreas Mohr wrote:
> As such one can conclude that this BIOS is rather very confused when being called for _GTM on an entirely
> unused controller port. And this is either because the BIOS is dumb or because ACPI doesn't really
> expect anyone to call _GTM on an unused physical port. I'd bet on the latter...
> (however I haven't found ACPI 3.0b explicitly mentioning this somewhere yet)

Thanks a lot for finding this out.  One of the two reports in bug 9320
seems to be the same problem although the other doesn't seem to be.  So,
it seems we'll have to check that both primary and secondary slots are
empty and skip _GTM if so.  :-(

Also, right, there's no need to fail suspend on _GTM failure whatever
the error is.  That was me being anal again.  Will incorporate both into
the ACPI fixes patchset.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/