Re: [PATCH] kbuild: implement modules.order

[Tejun Heo]

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And thinking about it, it doesn't seem to add any problems regarding 
> what I have in mind:
> 
> If we would ever stop having any well-defined link-order for in-kernel 
> code and express everything through initcall levels, we simply must 
> additionally update the modules.order file.

Expressing order in Makefile is a convenient way to express simple
ordering.  I think it's nice to keep it that way even if it doesn't
necessarily mean link order.  So, maybe we can do the reverse and make
built in modules follow module order regardless of actual link order
(say sort init table according to module order before final link).

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/