Re: [PATCH x86/mm 01/11] x86-32 thread_struct.debugreg

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Nov 29 2007 - 07:24:21 EST



thanks, i've merged your 11 patches - they passed a basic build and boot
test as well.

Roland, you've done a lot of gdb / strace / glibc development, what
would you suggest for us to use as a ptrace regression checker? The
problem is that ptrace is not normally used on a default bootup of a
distro, and some of the ptrace features are really arcane. UML is an
extensive ptrace user, so running it might be a good start, but do you
know of any, more directed testsuite that is expected to hit all (or at
least a substantial percentage of) the various ptrace features that we
are affecting with these ptrace patches?

btw., your cleanup patches are having a nice effect on code quality as
well:

errors lines of code errors/KLOC
[before] arch/x86/ 5231 116998 44.7
[after] arch/x86/ 5132 116656 43.9

(the 'errors' column is the sum of all .c files as per the error count
of scripts/checkpatch.pl --file output)

it's refreshing to see life being brought back into the ptrace code
again :-)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/