Re: [2.6 patch] x86: revert X86_HT semantics change

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Thu Nov 15 2007 - 13:03:18 EST


On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The x86 unification resulted in CONFIG_X86_HT no longer being
> set if (X86_32 && MK8).
Yup - my bad. I wrongly assumed MK8 was an X86_64 thing.

Thanks for fixing this.
>
> After grep'ing through the tree I think the problem is that different
> places have different assumptions about the semantics of CONFIG_X86_HT,
> either:
> - hyperthreading or
> - multicore
> and the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC dependencies are just one of the
> symptoms.
>
> This should be sorted out properly, but until then we should keep the
> 2.6.23 status quo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I assume Thomas & Co will forward the patch.

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/