Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework

[eric miao]

On Nov 14, 2007 11:30 AM, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, eric miao wrote:
> > > > Can we use "per gpio based" structure instead of "per gpio_chip" based one,
> > > > just like what the generic IRQ layer is doing nowadays?
> > >
> > > We "can" do most anything. What would that improve though?
>
> ... What would that improve, though?  Your followup posts
> still don't answer that question for me.  I see the code,
> but don't have an answer to that question.
>

to be honest, I don't feel like the holes. Put restrictions on the numbering
of GPIOs might not be a good idea either.

>
>
>



-- 
Cheers
- eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/