Re: [PATCH] 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 - Build Fail - fs/bfs/inode.c

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Nov 14 2007 - 00:26:19 EST


On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:30:54 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> The kernel build fails, with following error
>
> fs/bfs/inode.c: In function âbfs_igetâ:
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: âinoâ redeclared as different kind of symbol
> fs/bfs/inode.c:35: error: previous definition of âinoâ was here
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: âinodeâ undeclared (first use in this function)
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onlyonce
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [fs/bfs/inode.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/bfs] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/fs/bfs/inode.c 2007-11-14 09:53:41.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/fs/bfs/~inode.c 2007-11-14 10:21:06.000000000 +0530
> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc
>
> struct inode *bfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> {
> - unsigned long ino = inode->i_ino;
> struct bfs_inode *di;
> struct inode *inode;
> struct buffer_head *bh;
>

bah. That's what happens when I apply patches and fix rejects after doing
all my compile-coverage testing.

Thanks. I put your two fixes into the hot-fixes/ directory.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/