Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regressionwith tbench

[Christoph Lameter]

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

> BTW. your size-2048 kmalloc cache is order-1 in the default setup,
> wheras kmalloc(1024) or kmalloc(4096) will be order-0 allocations. And
> SLAB also uses order-0 for size-2048. It would be nice if SLUB did the
> same...

You can try to see the effect that order 0 would have by booting with

slub_max_order=0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/